What Is On-Chain Governance?

Table of Contents

What Is On-Chain Governance?

Let me explain on-chain governance to you directly: it's a built-in system for managing and applying changes to cryptocurrency blockchains. In this setup, the voting mechanisms for approving changes are coded right into the blockchain itself. Developers put forward proposals, and stakeholders vote to accept or reject them. These stakeholders could be developers, validators, token holders, or anyone else the blockchain includes in its design.

Key Takeaways

Here's what you need to know at a glance: on-chain governance is an embedded voting system that handles changes to cryptocurrency blockchains. It's designed to let the community decide on updates. Anyone can suggest changes, and those with voting rights determine if they get approved or not.

Understanding On-Chain Governance

On-chain governance systems are coded to let specific participants vote on changes. You submit proposals through the project's chosen method, like GitHub, Discord, Slack, or a forum. The network sends voting requests via user wallets or interfaces; you cast your vote, and the system records and counts them.

Each blockchain has its own voting rules—you'll see differences in how many votes are required to pass a proposal, who gets to vote, the weight of each vote, and even if there's a reward for participating.

Once the vote happens, the project follows the outcome. If it's approved, the change gets added to the blockchain, often leading to a fork when developers implement it. If rejected, everything stays the same.

While open-source blockchains let anyone propose changes, it's typically core developers who do it because they know the code best. Voting is for stakeholders who qualify, usually those holding tokens that give voting rights.

Fast Fact

Keep this in mind: blockchains aren't advanced enough for automatic forks after a vote passes. Developers still have to code, test, and release updates, and participants must update their systems. Right now, only the voting is automated.

Types of On-Chain Governance

On-chain governance varies across blockchains. Take Tezos, for example—it uses a self-amending ledger. Once the community approves changes, they're tested on a testnet version. If successful, they go live on the mainnet; if not, the testnet rolls back without affecting the main chain.

Future of On-Chain Governance

On-chain governance started as an inclusive way to handle blockchain tech, sharing benefits among participants. As communities push for better scalability, speed, and applications, these systems will probably grow in use.

Expect it to focus on boosting transparency and trust. DAOs already rely on it, and it could extend to enterprise decisions or even legislative voting.

The big challenge for everyone involved is avoiding centralization. Systems meant for fairness often get exploited by certain groups for their gain, and on-chain blockchains won't be immune.

Advantages of On-Chain Governance

Let's look at the upsides. First, it's decentralized—changes aren't filtered through a core team; every voter gets a say, discussing pros and cons collectively.

It also speeds up changes. Unlike informal systems that drag on with debates, this tallies votes quickly.

Plus, it enforces the outcome. After voting, developers must act on it, and node operators update or risk forking off from the community.

Disadvantages of On-Chain Governance

There are downsides too. Low voter turnout is common, like in real elections, leading to a small group controlling decisions and undermining decentralization.

Users with more tokens often get more votes, letting big stakeholders manipulate outcomes toward their interests, like profits over innovation.