What Was the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC)?
Let me tell you about the Resolution Trust Corporation, or RTC, which was a temporary federal agency that's now defunct. From 1989 to 1995, it primarily dealt with the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, where roughly a third of these U.S. institutions failed over a decade. The RTC essentially turned into a huge property-management operation, sorting out what was then the biggest collapse of American financial institutions since the Great Depression.
The RTC handled failed financial institutions put into receivership by selling or merging troubled thrifts and integrating their assets back into the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). It got the job done in about six years, starting slow but then accelerating by selling asset pools at steep discounts to private investors, which let the RTC share in any future profits from those pools.
In total, the RTC shut down 747 failed institutions holding $394 billion in assets, and it liquidated those assets as well.
Understanding the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC)
The RTC's main goal was to get the maximum value from selling assets of failed S&Ls while keeping disruptions to real estate and financial markets to a minimum.
The problems that led to the RTC started back in the 1970s. The S&L crisis came from risky investments by many small, supposedly safe S&Ls in the 1970s and 1980s. Thousands failed after using depositors' passbook savings to buy fixed-rate home mortgages that weren't easy to sell. These institutions exploited a flawed federal policy where all S&Ls paid the same federal deposit insurance rate, regardless of how risky their assets were. This caused the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation to collapse, and then the FDIC stepped in to take over.
Pros and Cons of the Resolution Trust Corporation
The RTC drew plenty of criticism, including over its estimated $130 billion cost. Many people were upset about using taxpayer money to bail out private financial firms.
A bigger issue, though, was that the failing S&Ls didn't really threaten the global economy, global markets, or even the U.S. economy much. Most economists today don't blame the S&L crisis for the 1990-91 recession, for instance. Looking back, the risks from these small savings institutions failing seem minor compared to events like the 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse.
That said, you could argue that the RTC's experiences—especially pooling and packaging assets and letting the government benefit from market recoveries—helped shape decisions in later government bailouts.
Correction Note
Just to set the record straight, an earlier version of similar articles might have said the RTC closed institutions in conservatorship, but the correct term is receivership.
Other articles for you

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is a system that integrates and manages core business processes to streamline operations and enhance communication across departments.

The Morning Star is a bullish candlestick pattern signaling a potential reversal from a downtrend to an uptrend.

Clearing is the essential process in finance where trades are reconciled, funds and securities are transferred, and transactions are settled securely.

The P/E 10 ratio is a long-term stock valuation metric using averaged, inflation-adjusted earnings over 10 years to assess market overvaluation.

The Markit LCDX is an index of loan-only credit default swaps covering 100 North American companies, traded over-the-counter and managed by investment banks.

A zero-coupon CD is a discounted investment that pays out its full face value at maturity without periodic interest.

Estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) is an approximation of the total recoverable oil or gas from a reserve or well in the oil and gas industry.

The Guinea Franc (GNF) is the national currency of Guinea, with a history linked to its independence and economic challenges.

Qualitative analysis evaluates a company's value using non-numerical, subjective data like management quality and industry trends.

A waiver of demand is a legal agreement where the endorser of a check or draft assumes responsibility for payment if the issuer defaults.